Ming the Mechanic:
Flucidity

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Flucidity2007-02-15 14:31
6 comments
picture by Flemming Funch

A.Sorel pointed me to his new TOE (Theory of Everything), Flucidity. I must admit, I wouldn't mind myself coming up with a simple theory that somehow explains phenomena in a great many fields, but I haven't succeeded. Sorel is not a physicist, but he goes in some detail explaining how his theory covers physics as well as economics, personal success, and just about anything else. Despite a couple of attempts, I just don't get the physics part, but looking around on the net, I notice that he gets a relatively promising welcome in physics forums. But as a life tool, I can certainly evaluate it, and it checks out quite well. It is represented in this little diagram there, with these components:

Representationexamples of representation include: names, symbols, dates, photos, models, souveniers and keepsakes, portfolio assets, people

This element signifies your intent and attracts potential energy. It is the primary expression of potential energy.

Without representation, there is no potential energy.
Potential Energyexamples of potential energy include: trust, emotions, fuel or energy, capital, incentives, or anything used for its capacity or space

This element is a representation without structure and one that does not interact.
Measurement and Structureexamples include: definitions, rules, guidelines, hierarchy, structure, reasoning, framework, linear order, particles

This element clarifies your intent and focuses potential energy.
Interaction and Associationexamples include: conversation, sitting, playing, being in a relationship, competing, walking, chaos, waves, gravity, perception & consciousness

This element is the way in which potential energy is expressed. Interaction is caused by more massive energies attracting less massive energies, while less massive energies are repelling the more massive energies.


This approach brings to mind the Law of Attraction, but this is more structured. Let's say there's something you'd like to happen, like, you want to live in a certain type of house. You'd start by making or finding a representation of it, which could be a drawing of it, or a photo, or a magazine. Then you create some structure around it, like, for example, you set up a game for yourself, of going to the kind of neighborhood you'd like to live in once per week, and you set up some rules, which might be completely arbitrary, like that you'll talk with exactly 3 different people in that neighborhood when you go visiting. That sets the stage for interactions, obviously. And all of that creates potential energy, building up some kind of momentum in the direction of your goal. It might bring you closer, and you end up in a new situation, where you might choose a new (better) representation, and go from there, in the same manner.

That works, and that's a pretty neat way of structuring it. Picking a representation of what one desires is a well-known tool. Putting a picture of your dream house on your refrigerator door, etc. But putting some structure and some rules around it quickly makes it more real. It has the advantage that one can make it arbitrarily easy, so one doesn't have to get lost in the great difficulty in doing what one wants. One does something more simple around the representation, which creates progress, but which also distracts from worrying about obstacles. The representation and the rules set up a potential. Inevitably one will interact with someone or something in carrying them out, which leads to new opportunities, which only can get one closer to one's aim.

So, A+ as a tool for materializing what one wants. Beyond that it makes my head spin if I try to grasp how that applies to physics, or how I can predict anything tangible with it. So, I'll leave it at that for now.


[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]

Category:  

6 comments

15 Feb 2007 @ 14:55 by swanny : Buddist Pose
The image is reminiscint of the buddha

conincidence... perhaps perhaps not

is 5 thus the synergy of the 4

2 + 2 = 5 ?

swanny  



15 Feb 2007 @ 17:28 by ming : Numbers
5 would be 2 and 3 together. 3 would be 1 and 2 together. Which should mean that if you add structure to potential energy, you get interaction, which sounds somewhat reasonable.  


16 Feb 2007 @ 12:14 by Lionel @82.227.198.101 : traditions

Interesting. Looks like Kabbalah (archetypal patterns, sephiroth). Or alchemy (three principles). Or even yi-king.  



16 Feb 2007 @ 17:16 by ming : Secret
OK, ok, calm down. But it sounds good that Oprah is on to it. I can imagine Michael Beckwith would be a great guest on her show. He's an inspirational speaker without equal.  


16 Feb 2007 @ 17:17 by ming : Kabbalah
Yeah, the drawing reminded me of the tree of life.  


21 Feb 2007 @ 20:53 by A Sorel @219.89.127.121 : Lotus Pose
I did notice that the model resembles the Lotus Pose, with each element having a corresponding point in the pose: the mind is a 'representation', the heart being 'potential energy', the right hand is 'dimension and structure' (left brain?), and the poser's left hand is 'interaction' (right brain?)

I also see the resemblance to the Tree of Life.  



Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other stories in
2014-11-07 23:12: Welcome to the 5th dimension
2011-11-07 17:22: Notice the incidental
2010-07-14 13:35: Consciousness of Pattern
2010-06-28 00:03: Pump up the synchronicity
2009-10-29 14:03: Convergent or Divergent
2007-08-05 23:45: Perverse incentives
2007-06-22 22:18: Elementary magic
2007-03-21 14:20: Cymatics and group formation
2007-03-15 01:06: Structural holes
2007-02-27 23:50: Leverage



[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 


Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001789.htm
Main Page: ming.tv