Ming the Mechanic:
Barlow on DRM

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Barlow on DRM2003-01-31 16:05
picture by Flemming Funch

Steve Gillmor interviews John Perry Barlow on his opinions of DRM (digital rights management), intellectual property law, and copyright extension. John is always worth listening to, and he has important things to say.
"I think that anybody who cares about the future of technology -- anybody who cares about the future, period -- ought to be awfully concerned about this. But people who work in technology have been agnostic on the subject so far. They need to recognize that they're going to be faced with a fairly stark choice, which is a gradual concentration around certain trusted platforms that cannot be broken out of and are filled with black boxes that you can't code around and can't see the inside of.

You have to get politically active and stop it from happening, because Congress has been bought by the content industry. The choice is being made at a very complex and subterranean political level. It's being done in standard settings, with the FCC, in amendments to obscure bills in Congress, in the closed door sessions to set the Digital Broadcast Standard. It has very significant long-term effects [for] the technical architecture of cyberspace, because what we're talking about embedding into everything is a control and surveillance mechanism for the purpose of observing copyright piracy, but [it] can be used for anything."
And as an answer to the question of why it is so difficult to present the case that fair use needs to be protected he says:
"It's a difficult proposition because the content industry has done a marvelously good job of getting people to believe that there's no difference between a song and a horse, whereas for me, if somebody's singing my song, I think that's great. They haven't stolen anything from me. If somebody rides off on my horse, I don't have anything and that is theft. Otherwise intelligent people think that there's no difference between stealing my horse and stealing my song. [The content industry] has also managed to create the simplistic and basically fallacious notion that unless we strengthen dramatically the existing copyright [regime], that artists don't get paid anymore. First of all, artists aren't getting paid much now. Second, making the institutions that are robbing them blind even stronger is not going to assure [their] getting paid more. And it's going to make it very difficult for us to create economic [and] business models that would create a more interactive relationship with the audience, which would be good for us economically and good for us creatively."

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



1 Feb 2003 @ 14:19 by sharie : Who is the enemy?
"artists aren't getting paid much now" ?

Tell that to Madonna, Mariah, Celine Dion, Faith Hill and the other multi-millionaires in the business. Tell that to their managers and agents, their costume designers, voice coaches, recording engineers, producers, make-up artists, hair stylists.... Music is big business. Executives are earning millions, but singers, musicians, songwriters... they shouldn't benefit from their own labor... is that it?

This battle is being waged in the wrong theatre. Rather than stripping the wealth from creative artists, I suggest we find a way to say that the common good is undermined when excess wealth is allowed in private hands, and then limit the wealth a person is allowed to have. No one needs more than a million dollars to survive, or even half a million. Why do we allow this and simultaneously relegate millions of people to live in squalor?  

29 Apr 2016 @ 04:57 by Ving @ : TiZbJMFucXfvzsb
Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But imagine if you added some great graphics or video clips to give your posts more, ܜpop„! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this website could undeniably be one of the very best in its field. Excellent blog!  

Other stories in
2014-09-27 00:04: You must be an expert by now
2014-09-26 15:15: Brevity
2011-11-06 21:33: Counting what counts
2011-01-23 13:46: Authenticity
2010-08-23 01:31: Semantic Pauses
2010-06-27 02:28: Doubt
2009-10-25 17:04: Opinions, perceptions and intuition
2009-10-15 08:32: Abstraction
2008-06-29 16:47: Complicated and Complex
2008-02-20 16:39: The universe as a virtual reality

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-000518.htm
Main Page: ming.tv