Ming the Mechanic:
Leaderless Resistance

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Leaderless Resistance2003-03-18 23:59
picture by Flemming Funch

I was reading this quote from an article called Leaderless Resistance Today:
"The new communications technologies make it possible for a movement to exist solely as an ideology, with no membership lists, no financial records, no direct communication between the operatives — and no "off" switch. There is no way to negotiate with such an ideology, no way to compromise.

...Because there is no formal "group" with assets, interpersonal relationships, or other stabilizing factors, individuals who moderate simply leave the milieu; their writings and actions remain behind, recruiting new members."
..and I was thinking "Yeah, that's fabulous, that's the kind of stuff we need!!", when I actually looked at the article and realized it was about terrorist groups and dangerous elements in society, and how movements might continue, simply based on an ideology, a book, a website, an event, even without any organizing network, without an organization, without any leaders. And the article talks about how that is a very bad thing, and how we might stop that. But I'm looking for how we might start that. Oh, not focused on hate and violence as the article is talking about. Focused on truth, freedom, beauty, love, the common good. Imagine that there were nothing any frantic monopoly could do to stop people from spontaneously making things work better and being more fun, and from exposing the truth at every turn. No organizational leadership to buy off, no accounts to bankrupt, nobody to put in jail, no communication channels to cut. Just millions of people who freely and voluntarily operated as cells of a bigger body, without even having to talk about it. Heheh.

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



12 Apr 2003 @ 21:08 by dwig : Shifting leadership
This reminds me of a slightly different kind of movement: the student resistance in Serbia that helped bring down Slobodan Milosevic. In http://www.pbs.org/weta/dictator/otpor/ownwords/popovic.html, one of the participants describes how they constantly "rotated" the "public leaders". Every few weeks, someone new would be leading demonstrations, giving interviews, or whatever; this made it impossible for the authorities to "behead" the movement by arresting the leaders. (The rest of the story is worth reading too, including an online version of Gene Sharp's book on nonviolent resistance that was kind of the handbook of the movement.)  

13 Apr 2003 @ 21:30 by ming : Changing leaders
Ah, yes, great reference.  

1 May 2016 @ 22:51 by Kyanna @ : bRslipZMYUpVUh
Es cierto, no van al q más votos tiene, pero le quitas votos a otros partidos, ya sea oposición o a partidos mitasinorior. A fin de cuentas, el partido minoritario se vuelve fuerte cuando no hay mayoría absoluta y lo necesitan para una coalición. Hay que votar siempre!  

Other stories in
2010-07-10 13:01: Strong Elastic Links
2010-07-08 02:27: Truth: superconductivity for scalable networks
2010-06-27 02:28: Be afraid, be very afraid
2008-07-06 23:20: Laws of social networks
2008-06-20 15:40: Peer material production
2008-05-06 13:57: Why can't we stick to our goals?
2008-02-21 21:16: Open social networks
2007-11-08 01:49: The value of connections
2007-11-07 00:51: Diversity counterproductive to social capital?
2007-07-13 23:42: Plan vs Reality

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-000672.htm
Main Page: ming.tv