Ming the Mechanic:
Blogs and Wikis

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Blogs and Wikis2004-04-09 09:53
picture by Flemming Funch

Lilia Efimova on "From creative mess to products (blogs and wikis for thinking)"
"Thinking of blogs vs. wikis to support thinking. For me blogging is easier - it shows how ideas unfold over time and somehow I don't have a problem when I create new page (I do think twice in wikis - because it increases navigation mess). Blogging is also about permalinking and hypertexting half-baked ideas...

The problem is that at the certain moment there is a critical mass (critical mess ;) of bits related to a theme. At this moment you need a least an overview of all of them and then a way to construct something more coherent. Wikis are great for that. It's much easier to get an overview of ideas (if they collected on one page :), edit them into something better or even go for refactoring the whole thing.

But then you get the clarity of a final product and lose an overview of path that took you there. And I'm getting more and more convinced that process and artefacts on the way is as important as the final product."
I myself haven't so far really gotten into Wikis. Even though I'm missing a place to put subjects together in a more coherent way. Blogs work really well for me to write in, exactly because I don't have to think of where something fits or where I'm going with it or even if it is a complete thought. It is a somewhat divergent tool. Happily goes in many directions. But also keeps a linear record, and is a unified pool to find things in later. But then I'd also like convergent tools. Tools that help me make things come together into more clear and complete ideas, more full projects, functional spaces for collaboration, etc. I'm not sure Wikis automatically facilitate that, although they can of course. They can be whatever one makes them. Including something that goes off into a zillion directions and where one can't easily find the pieces again. Or focused spaces where one or more people keep refining what they know.

Then about "process and artefacts on the way". More channels, in part. And ways of stepping through what happened, along various dimensions, most significantly chronologically. A blog shows things that happen (are posted) chronologically, and it includes credits of where posts come from, or what they respond to. Which other tools like Technorati can come and catalog. But it probably doesn't show us the whole process of how the posts come about. Wikis keep track of successive changes, i.e. revisions of pages, but I'm not sure anybody uses that to chart the process of increased value accummulation.

Need tools that can better implement guiding patterns. A blog is one pattern, of a continous stream. A wiki is a free-form format where you can come up with your own pattern, but it is hard to guide it. Other tools might provide gentle guidance that inspires certain things to happen, and that include sufficient tracking of how it happens, to be able to examine the process after the fact or along the way.

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



19 Dec 2014 @ 16:41 by Maximo @ : lSasdPWRbkhwqm
I am a lifelong Liberal and fomrer parliamentary candidate from the days when the Liberal Party allowed room for individual conscience in society, provided no-one was harmed by the exercise of that conscience. Today, the Lib Dems are supporting a law that would compel individuals to act against their consciences. This is a direct challenge to another law The Human Rights Act 1998 which clearly states:13. (1) If a court's determination of any question arising under this Act might affect the exercise by a religious organisation (itself or its members collectively) of the Convention right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, it must have particular regard to the importance of that right.Religious freedom is a fundamental human right and one that we have fought for in the past as well as demand for other nations in the present time. When freedom of religion goes, other freedoms soon follow and I am horrified to see that Ming Cambell now interprets the word liberal to mean oppressive.  

23 Dec 2014 @ 10:20 by Sandra @ : SBleFkbvdiYtckRQTE
Btitish political ctluure is devoid of real opinion and debate therefore, a referendum on the treaty will force leaders of all parties to the answer the question. However, the danger is not that of its creation but the outcome.If the public do not share the pro european stance then where would we be ? I believe that we would have differentiated ourselves to the point where our position is distinctive but critically Sir Menzies, the presentation of our argument is the single biggest political challenge of our time. The brand, the message and the messenger are of equal weighting.How do you intend to do this ?  

Other stories in
2014-09-27 00:04: You must be an expert by now
2014-09-26 15:15: Brevity
2011-11-06 21:33: Counting what counts
2011-01-23 13:46: Authenticity
2010-08-23 01:31: Semantic Pauses
2010-06-27 02:28: Doubt
2009-10-25 17:04: Opinions, perceptions and intuition
2009-10-15 08:32: Abstraction
2008-06-29 16:47: Complicated and Complex
2008-02-20 16:39: The universe as a virtual reality

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001194.htm
Main Page: ming.tv