Ming the Mechanic:
Oblique Strategies

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Oblique Strategies2006-03-15 23:43
by Flemming Funch

Oblique Strategies was a set of 100 cards, created by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt in 1975, as a way of assisting creative problem solving. If you're a little stuck, you'd draw a card, and see if it somehow gives you an idea for how to move forward. It is an aid for lateral thinking, basically. Providing a somewhat off-the-wall suggestion which makes you maybe see things from a different angle. There are many possible ways of provoking lateral thinking, like the old trick of looking up one or two random words in the dictionary. I'd love to make a little program or site that assembles a bunch of these methods in one place. For now, below is the list from Oblique Strategies, assembled by Robin Pamar, from several different versions of the deck. Note that Brian Eno is an avantgarde composer, so some of these are a bit specific to sound, but not much, and it doesn't really matter when we're talking lateral thinking.
A line has two sides
A very small object. Its center
Abandon desire
Abandon normal instructions
Accept advice
Adding on
Always give yourself credit for having more than personality
Ask people to work against their better judgement
Ask your body
Balance the consistency principle with the inconsistency principle
Be dirty
Be extravagant
Breathe more deeply
Bridges -- build -- burn
Change ambiguities to specifics
Change instrument roles
Change nothing and continue consistently
Children -- speaking -- singing
Cluster analysis
Consider different fading systems
Consult other sources -- promising -- unpromising
Convert a melodic element into a rhythmic element
Cut a vital connection
Decorate, decorate
Destroy nothing; Destroy the most important thing
Discard an axiom
Disciplined self-indulgence
Discover your formulas and abandon them
Display your talent
Distort time
Do nothing for as long as possible
Do something boring
Do something sudden, destructive and unpredictable
Do the last thing first
Do the washing up
Do the words need changing?
Do we need holes?
Don't avoid what is easy
Emphasize differences
Emphasize repetitions
Emphasize the flaws

Feed the recording back out of the medium
Fill every beat with something
Find a safe part and use it as an anchor
Get your neck massaged
Ghost echoes
Give the name away
Give way to your worst impulse
Go outside. Shut the door.
Go slowly all the way round the outside
How would you have done it?
Idiot glee
Imagine the piece as a set of disconnected events
Infinitesimal gradations
Intentions -- nobility of -- humility of -- credibility of
Into the impossible
Is it finished?
Is something missing?
Is the intonation correct?
It is quite possible (after all)
Just carry on
Left channel,right channel, center channel
Listen to the quiet voice
Look at the order in which you do things
Lost in useless territory
Lowest common denominator
Magnify the most difficult details
Make a blank valuable by putting it in an exquisite frame
Make what's perfect more human
Mechanize something idiosyncratic
Mute and continue
Only one element of each kind
Openly resist change
(Organic) machinery
Put in earplugs
Reevaluation (a warm feeling)
Remember quiet evenings
Remove a restriction
Repetition is a form of change
Short circuit (example: a man eating peas with the idea that they will improve his virility shovels them straight into his lap)
Simple subtraction
Spectrum analysis
Take a break
Take away the important parts
Tape your mouth
The inconsistency principle
The tape is now the music'
Think of the radio
Tidy up
Trust in the you of now
Turn it upside down
Twist the spine
Use an old idea
Use an unacceptable color
Use fewer notes
Use filters
Use your own ideas
What are the sections sections of? Imagine a caterpillar moving
What are you really thinking about just now?
What is the reality of the situation?
What mistakes did you make last time?
What would your closest friend do?
Work at a different speed
You are an engineer
You can only make one dot at a time
Your mistake was a hidden intention
Don't break the silence
Don't stress one thing more than another
Use "unqualified" people
What wouldn't you do?
Try faking it [Stewart Brand]
Slow preparation, fast execution
Is the style right?
Where is the edge?
Voice your suspicions
What is the simplest solution?
Make it more sensual
Use something nearby as a model
Think -- inside the work -- outside the work
What context would look right?
When is it for?
What to increase? What to reduce? What to maintain?
How would someone else do it?
Would anyone want it?
Go to an extreme, come part way back
Once the search has begun, something will be found
Be less critical
From nothing to more than nothing
Retrace your steps
Only a part, not the whole
Faced with a choice, do both [Dieter Rot]
Always give yourself credit for having more than personality [Arto Lindsay]
Revaluation (a warm feeling)
Lost in useless territory
It is quite possible (after all)
Idiot glee
Move towards the unimportant
It is simply a matter of work
Not building a wall; making a brick
The most easily forgotten thing is the most important
State the problem as clearly as possible
Always the first steps
Question the heroic
Go outside. Shut the door.
In total darkness, or in a very large room, very quietly
Which parts can be grouped?
Change specifics to ambiguities
Use cliches
Consider transitions

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



17 Mar 2006 @ 18:57 by redwind : hum
Live & Die every day  

9 Jun 2006 @ 04:30 by jonah @ : expand laterally
a line has 2 sides ,however it also has the beginning and end
has width ,or broadness ,can be visable or not
can be suggestive of dimention
may be short or long
be extended into infinity or begin and end in a dot,
did i mention curved/coiled ,reducing and expanding/contracting
....avery small center..//thats a circle
a very smallcenter,is a dot
abandon desire ,line 3,thank you i abandon my desire to explain further
4/now..lets just see that tomorrow reveal
over it for know./now/  

19 Dec 2014 @ 17:37 by Diogo @ : EQqlrXPYJikjIodl
Now I feel stpudi. That's cleared it up for me  

23 Dec 2014 @ 10:59 by Carolrosah @ : uEpETJPzfdcGoKCP
我最近剛好聽了一場Alain Badiou的講座 他談及語言問題時 認為 ccneopt 一開始確實會被語言所影響 每種不同的語言其用字和用法所產生的描述既會與文化連結 又會左右我們形構出的世界觀樣貌 進而影響哲學的思考型態 但終究重點是在於 ccneopt 而非語言 所以一來我們可以 也應該跳脫出語言的侷限去追求 ccneopt 二來每種語言所反映出的不同文化載體彼此間都會有溝通性 也正因如此 ccneopt 是可以世界化並被普世地理解的 就算當中可能會遇到困難和障礙 我們也會透過新詞的創造和語言的再造來解決之 使 ccneopt 不被語言的宰制與疏忽而邊緣化 不曉得這樣的見解是否有回應到1樓phantoms的想法 我是認為此一見解挺不錯的 而且還和Turvey的部份觀點有著對立性 它點破了Turvey考慮不周的地方 而且似乎能更宏觀地面對Turvey所提到的問題 各位有什麼想法呢  

Other stories in
2012-01-01 00:20: New year wish
2009-10-27 23:59: Compassion Exercise
2009-10-26 23:48: The power of appreciation
2008-02-21 13:04: A Samurai’s Creed
2008-02-20 15:38: Experiencing
2007-11-07 00:50: Say what you feel
2007-11-06 23:38: Steve Habib Rose
2007-06-21 19:16: How does one have a blogversation?
2007-06-20 21:53: Self-portraits
2007-06-15 16:26: Life instructions

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001643.htm
Main Page: ming.tv