Ming the Mechanic:
Moblogging from the front and the new Reformation

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Moblogging from the front and the new Reformation2004-05-26 16:33
picture by Flemming Funch

Clay Shirky talks on Corante about how grassroots sharing of powerful information and pictures are changing things:
Jaques Barzun, author of the marvelous history of modernity From Dawn to Decadence (1500 - present), makes the point that the Catholic Church as a pan-European political force was done in by the Protestant Reformation, itself fueled by the printing press. Once the Church lost the ability to control the direct perception of scripture, thanks to the printing of (relatively) cheap bibles in languages other than Latin, their loss of political hegemony followed.

This is what we are seeing now relative to the military’s control of information. A year or so ago, someone in the DoD told me that the thing that would most affect the prosecution of the war in Iraq would be images of DAB’s — Dead American Bodies. The unplanned spread of photos of coffins, and now of torture victims, means that control of this part of the war is outside the military’s hands.

The spread of images from Iraq, both relatively plain ones like most of what’s on the YAFRO blogs to the horrifying images of torture and abuse from the Abu Ghraib prison are all part of the removal of bottlenecks that will change the political structure in ways we can’t predict.[...]

Now we are in a mirror world, where the newly free production and distrubution of images is the novelty. Hearing about DABs or torture victims is nothing like seeing them — I had to rip the cover of the Economist this week because my wife can’t stand to see the image of the man on the box with the electrodes in his hands.

New tools for spreading of the word are powerful, of course — witness the weblog explosion in all its complexity. But the spread of images is a different kind of thing, not least because images pass across linguistic borders like a lava flow. Now that production and distribution of images are in the hands of the laity, it’s a safe bet that we are entering a world of “That will kill this.” We just don’t know what parts of society “this” refers to yet.
No wonder Donald Rumsfeld wants to forbid American soldiers from having camera phones. But it is hopefully too late. Shirky's right: we can maybe more easily ignore words, but pictures are much harder to get around. Rumors of atrocities don't carry nearly the same weight as pictures of them. Particularly unregulated pictures leaked by people who just happened to be around with a digital camera. What made 9-11 hit so hard was to a large part the pictures. The video of the burning and collapsing towers, and the pictures of the individuals who died, and their families. But that came through the centralized media. Now imagine that the government and media could no longer control what images are widely shared. That, whatever happens, some casual bystander will have taken pictures, and the pictures will be on a bunch of people's blogs the same day.

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



26 May 2004 @ 16:41 by martha : After all
we the american public pay for most of the photos so why can't we see them. Do you think donald is ashamed of something? ( I do)  

27 May 2004 @ 00:19 by vaxen : well...
try not to forget that the 'internet' came from 'ARPA' now DARPA and that most of the technological advances we will see in the years to come are already in the hands of the 'military.' the military can be a good thing too. a double edged sword, to be sure, yet war is the primal force behind technological progress. perhaps there is a universal to be discovered therein such as the 'spin' made possible via yin yang interchange. thanks flemming san...

In 'Manhood of Humanity' Alfred Korzybski (Kahshibski) mentions thinking in pictures. Remember?  

27 May 2004 @ 05:33 by ming : Progress
It is intriguing that a lot of our technological advances come from the war machine. Wars really get resources and creativity channeled. And in some ways bring out the best in people. In other ways it brings out the worst. It is going to be a bit of a problem coming up with a replacement that isn't so destructive at the same time.

I didn't read 'Manhood of Humanity'. But it seems like an easier read than 'Science and Sanity'.  

31 May 2004 @ 09:27 by Jon Husband @ : Power Shifts
Sounds like another antibody-based pushback, as hierarchy keeps being pestered by a growing "wirearchy" ?  

Other stories in
2014-09-30 23:43: Good products
2011-12-01 17:56: Are jobs becoming obsolete?
2011-11-20 23:39: Order and violence
2011-11-15 23:30: Being prepared
2011-11-10 01:11: World Transformation
2011-02-23 23:12: The Collective Intelligence Singularity
2009-06-16 00:39: Baseline technology
2009-06-07 15:00: The Giant in Nantes
2008-10-14 19:56: Money and the Crisis of Civilization
2008-05-08 23:01: Why Denmark is the world's happiest country

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001260.htm
Main Page: ming.tv