Ming the Mechanic:
Blogging/Microblogging and work

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Blogging/Microblogging and work2009-06-11 18:53
3 comments
picture by Flemming Funch

I suppose that one of the reasons that I and many other people don't blog as much as they used to is that we're microblogging. "Microbloging" is one of the words for what you do on Twitter or Facebook. Instead of attempting to write articles, one does little one-liners to answer the question "What are you doing?", preferably a number of times during the day.

You can squeeze quite a bit into 140 characters, and it inspires people to be more clear and succinct. It might inspire people to be mindful of what they actually are doing, what they feel, what they actually have to say. Then again, it might make others go on an on about nothing much.

A lot of my friends in social networks are some kind of tech gurus. People who'd speak at tech conferences. Many of them are talking a lot about twitter. How it somehow is an answer to everything, replacing blogs, bookmarks, search engines, forums, etc.

And I think it is cool too. It is just not quite there yet. You can't have much of a conversation on twitter. And you can't really talk about what you're really doing. Nobody's working on twitter, for one thing. Oh, people are flying around, meeting interesting people, speaking at conferences, etc. Which for some people is some kind of work. But what's missing is all the detail, what's actually going on, how you actually do it, who pays for it, etc.

Both blogging and microblogging are mainly for show. Microblogging feels a bit more real, more real time, more honest. But it still has to adhere to a certain agreed format, which doesn't leave room for more than the highlights.

Most of what we'd call "work" involves a certain intensity and volume and a certain persistence. You stay with something until you've gotten some kind of result. That takes whatever it takes, maybe trial and error, maybe a certain amount of time, certainly a certain series of actions. The log of what you actually did would be quite voluminous.

You could have a meeting in an instant messenger or twitter format. Or you could have a meeting in the comments of a blog. I mean a meeting where there's something you need to decide or plan or solve. That could easily be a hundred messages exchanged between the people who're involved. But nobody would have the patience for listening to that on twitter, unless they were part of the same project. Too much, too boring, too revealing.

Which is why nobody shares much of what they really do, other than markers. "I arrived in New York", "I'm going to the Google board meeting", "There's a fly in my coffee". We get a sense of what kind of stuff this person is up to, and a sense of who they are. But no sense of what they actually do that's working.

OK, I have a bit of the same problem with people in the real world: that it usually is a well guarded secret what they really do. But that's a different discussion. My point here was more about the search for a format for online interaction that both allows a peripheral awareness of what many people are up to, and that also allows more intensive activity to happen, without having to "go somewhere else" and do it. Maybe Google Wave?


[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]

Category:  

3 comments

17 Jul 2009 @ 04:59 by a-d : I really think NCN provides exactly that
Special-Place that you "are looking for" both the "short version-space " and the "long version" of/for "THAT" "Something, where Things can be sorted in different qualities and quantities, so to speak! : )> (This IS NCN's STRONG POINT!  


16 Aug 2009 @ 22:31 by Jon Husband @24.85.246.147 : Back to the future (again) ?
I may be not a regular quaffer of all things socnet and 2.0 Kool-aid .. I keep thinking that over time .. maybe about 10 years ? ... Google Wave and other services of its ilk may drive people to value asynchronicity and (perhaps) more effectively-managed personal email (again) .. what do you think ?  


3 Sep 2009 @ 14:17 by ming : Asynchronicity
I think you might be right. With some much richer tools for asynchronous interaction, it could be the best of several worlds. Twitter is good at being real time, but that real time focus also makes it pretty bad for conversations or for work. I should be able to respond to something you said last week as easily as what you said 5 minutes ago, without any of us losing the context.

We also need better ways of zooming in and out, to get more or less detail to suit our needs and desires. It seems to me that Wave will be helpful there too, if I understand it right. Like, a real meeting or a real conversation might be a hundred individual messages. Maybe it is good enough for me to know that the meeting took place, so I shouldn't be overwhelmed with every sentence everybody said scrolling by. But if I really do care, it should be a matter of just drilling down.

There are too few dimensions in Twitter. I should see some tips of icebergs scrolling by, and if it is about something I'm into, I should be able to scroll sideways and get the whole thing.  



Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other stories in
2012-01-24 00:50: Intellectual Property
2011-11-03 16:51: Seeing the world through the Internet
2008-02-23 17:19: Web 1, 2, 3 and 4
2008-02-22 11:07: Illusion
2008-01-09 22:45: A Communication Model
2007-12-02 20:41: Give One Get One
2007-10-25 21:47: Static or dynamic web metaphors
2007-09-18 22:54: Rethinking blogs
2007-07-04 23:59: Scrutiny of Information
2007-07-03 01:24: Strangeness



[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 


Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001937.htm
Main Page: ming.tv