Ming the Mechanic:
Seeing the world through the Internet

The NewsLog of Flemming Funch
 Seeing the world through the Internet2011-11-03 16:51
picture by Flemming Funch

In the human eye, a system of little rods and cones pick up light that comes into the eye. Some 120 million rods in an eye will measure the intensity of the light. The 6-7 million cones will measure colors. The brain then puts all these "pixels" together into what we perceive as one coherent, continuous picture, with lots of details, in color, different shades, etc. It is a bit of an illusion, but it allows us to rather accurately predict what we find around us. You see an object, you can estimate its distance, and you can reach out your hand and find it where you expected.

On the Internet, we're increasingly being presented with a stream of information chunks. Compared with a few years ago, the chunks have gotten smaller and there are many more of them. Twitter, Facebook walls, Google+, SMS, e-mail, it is all streams. New stuff shows up non-stop. Thousands of items every day for most of us.

At some point in the past, one would find it natural to simply process everything that showed up, because the volume of it was small. If somebody wrote me a personal letter, I would of course read it carefully, and I would of course sit down and write an answer back. Even if it took me an hour, and it was only for one person. If I subscribed to a newspaper, I would read it. And I still remember living in a country where there was one TV channel, only broadcasting in the late afternoon and in the evening. If there was anything on the program that would be within my interest area, I would watch it, as would everybody else. Today, all of that is more or less impossible, so we've gotten used to ignoring most of it, skimming a lot of it, and only digging deeply into a few choice items.

So, now, as we're no longer dutifully digesting and responding to every single item, it becomes more about the overall picture of what's happening. We're noticing what people are talking about, we're noticing trends. We have a general idea about what our friends are into, based on having seen a bunch of their postings flow by in our peripheral attention.

But are the information chunks we receive suitable pixels that allow us to form a coherent and continuous picture of what is there? Yes and no. We do get glimpses of a lot of incidental information that allows us to form a picture. But we also get large volumes of fictional information, stuff that's made up to present a certain picture, which isn't really what's there.

We've gotten quite used to experts preparing news articles for us. Then we pass those around, adding our own like or dislike opinions about them. Other people will write new articles, quoting those first articles. Whatever they say gets amplified, distorted and colored along the way. What people trade in and respond to is those information particles. Articles, postings, words, links, likes, retweets. None of that includes much in terms of ways of interacting with the source matter, the stuff that's actually there, or that actually happened. OK, an article might have links to sources, or to organizations being discussed. It might have pictures. There might be live or recorded video, showing actual events. But the ratio of actual stuff to opinions about such stuff is relatively low.

This all gives me the problem of how I can assemble a coherent and reasonably correct picture of stuff through the medium of electronic communications. First of all, all the pieces aren't easily assembled. They don't necessarily fit together. And even if I assemble what they say, the picture might be of something mostly fictional. Fox News presents a rather coherent picture, but it probably isn't what actually is there. Imagine then the difficulties of a Semantic Web, where the meaning of stuff supposedly would be brought out, simply by automatically examining how things are tagged. Spam and propaganda and misdirection are all included into the picture.

How can we make the stream of info pieces more useful for assembling useful pictures of what is there?

Incidental, peripheral information is often more honest than what is contrived and constructed to send a certain message. If somebody's sending you a message, you can expect that they've constructed the message to say just what they'd like you to receive, that it is somehow twisted to their advantage, and that they've left out lots of things that aren't what they wanted to say. There doesn't have to be any sinister motives for that, almost everybody's doing it to one degree or another. It is hard to know who people really are, if you only listen to their carefully crafted press releases, or tweets, or lectures, or comments. It is hard to know what really happened, if you get it from somebody with an economic interest in presenting it a certain way.

Incidental, unguarded, raw information feeds might be much better in conveying the complexity of the world, and might thus be much better material for assembling an image fo what is there.

If you're watching somebody give a presentation, a video feed would allow you to pick up much more information than the words he's saying, in the form of body language, the setting he's in, who else is there, etc.

Whereas you only get to know certain choice aspects of a certain person's personality from reading their tweets, an open video channel would tell you a lot more. Imagine just opening up a video conference connection with a friend for an hour, while each of you went about your normal business. If you simply ignored each other, you might well learn more about each other than if you had had an intense conversation during that time. Because you would convey information that isn't prepared and prepackaged to look a certain way. The complexity of the truth would be more available. Who you're receiving phone calls from, how you talk to your kids, what you actually spend your time on, how you look when you're not trying to look good, etc.

There are other ways it could happen than live video of course, but that is one good example. You'll notice that we have several kinds of Internet tools. Most of them are meant for conveying stuff that's constructed. Others are meant for conveying something more raw. There are location services that transmit your location, no matter where you are. There are others than let you check in when you're in an interesting place. Notice the difference. If I'd want to form a more true picture of you, I'd find more use in the continuous raw feeds, which also tells me that you go to the supermarket and the bank, not just when you travel to exotic places.

So, please, give me more raw un-edited feeds of everything. Also and particularly for big corporations and governments. I don't just want to see ads and speeches. I want to see raw complex feeds that I can piece together into what they actually are doing, not what they say they're doing.

Also, think about the raw material available for our collective intelligence to emerge. Imagine that a global brain is beginning to wake up, and that its raw material is the information we share electronically. If all we feed it is press releases, news articles, Facebook walls, tweets, and reruns of "I love Lucy", how is it going to turn out?

As the world is speeding up, becoming more complex and more inter-connected, it is becoming increasingly more important to be able to see what is going on in a wider sphere. There are a lot of forces at work that sabotage this. Information silos that keep things to themselves, inside their own sites, to hold on to customers and be more valuable. A culture where few people report on things, and most others just re-transmit the reports, without taking time to verify anything for themselves. Protocols that encourage information to be disconnected from their sources. For better or for worse, the Internet was constructed that way. You don't know if the e-mail you just got really was from the person it says it is from. You don't know where most of the information on web pages comes from. Better, more trustworthy, less fragmented technologies can be developed.

In the meantime, your best bet for seeing the world more as it is, is to seek out unfiltered, unguarded communication channels. Seek out or create feeds of stuff that it would be impractical for anybody to doctor or police. Poke holes through the armor of large organizations, force them to open up unfiltered streams of any kind.

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic]



4 Nov 2011 @ 22:47 by swanny @ : love joy and happiness
nov 4 2011
canada 4:44 pm mdt

re: info overload

hi ming... true enough article....
earlier i tended to address the info overload by just focusing on the things that
"resonated" with me as a means to cut through the clutter but today.... i think i may take a different approach... in terms of asking.... this ...
what are the things that bring me happiness, joy and love,.... these then might be the questions to ask and the things to know.... .... does this bring me joy, love happiness.... as i was driving here to the college... i asked that... does driving through this train wreck of traffic bring me happiness, joy or love... the answer was invariably no but it shed a new light or perspective on things... a way of making or guiding sense.... any way thanks for your thoughts... you are a generous man....

ed jonas
rd ab ca  

16 Oct 2014 @ 08:04 by taranga @ : seeing the world through love etc
Maybe we need to down grade the relative importance of the digital input and expand the real contact with like minded souls. The imternet could still be very important as a link between such groups. I often find that the solution to a problem will occur to me directly as a result of a real conversation.

William Morris [author of a lovely scifi story 'News from Nowhere'] remarked that you should aim to only keep items in your home that are either useful or beautiful preferable both. May be this piece of wisdom should be applied to digital feeds as after all they are not only in your house but cluttering up your brain!

I perceive a need for a new more customisable set of filters for all digital rivers to exclude less real and to allow, albeit temporarily, the exclusion of distracting cute animals!

I must say Ming, that your thoughts and articles are remarkable for their breadth and depth and very stimulating - long may you continue to stimulate our grey matter.


25 Dec 2014 @ 22:23 by Antidepressant pills cheap online @ : Antidepressant No Prescription
Venlor a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is prescribed to treat depression, anxiety and panic attacks, depression and general anxiety disorder  

16 May 2015 @ 07:07 by ste @ : wt
http://www.sia.fr/polo-ralph-lauren-pas-cher.htm linkklin0516  

31 Jul 2015 @ 12:10 by revitol creams @ : Revitol stretch mark cream
I am admired with the work.  

3 Aug 2015 @ 11:48 by cheap essay writing service @ : Nice!
It is really a great achievement which deserves great appreciation. All the best and keep repeating this kind of achievements in the coming future as well.  

25 Aug 2015 @ 06:19 by buy cheap essays @ : Interesting
Because of posts like this I surf the internet and when I found you, the time I felt I was wasting, just turned my thoughts around and now I am thinking I invested my time in something really interesting.  

28 Aug 2015 @ 15:42 by Lisa @ : Nice!
Pretty nice post I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I've really enjoyed browsing your blog posts After all I'll be subscribing to your feed.

9 Sep 2015 @ 03:07 by ming @ : Seeing the world through the Internet
Je suis heureux de visiter et aussi lire un excellent article sur notre site. S'il vous plaît également visiter.

16 Sep 2015 @ 10:00 by 1000 likes @ : 1000 likes
This blog is really great. The information here will surely be of some help to me. Thanks!.  

16 Sep 2015 @ 10:00 by how to get more youtube views @ : how to get more youtube views
This blog is really great. The information here will surely be of some help to me. Thanks!.  

19 Sep 2015 @ 13:11 by bolapojok.com @ : bolapojok.com
This is a good post. This post gives truly quality information. I’m definitely going to look into it. Really very useful tips are provided here. Thank you so much. Keep up the good works.  

13 Oct 2015 @ 08:11 by The Venus Factor Review @ : The Venus Factor Review
thank you for your interesting infomation.  

13 Oct 2015 @ 08:13 by The Venus Factor Review @ : The Venus Factor Review
this is really nice to read..informative post is very good to read..thanks a lot!  

14 Oct 2015 @ 07:17 by iherb coupons @ : iherb coupons
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly that love and read more on this topic. If possible, such as gain knowledge, would you mind updating your blog with additional information? It is very useful for me.  

21 Oct 2015 @ 11:24 by The Venus Factor @ : The Venus Factor
The Venus Factor, The Venus Factor Review
this is really nice to read..informative post is very good to read..thanks a lot!  

23 Oct 2015 @ 08:26 by neurofuse coupon from getfreestuffonline @ : neurofuse coupon from getfreestuffonline
I have read your article, it is very informative and helpful for me.I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles. Thanks for posting it..  

23 Oct 2015 @ 08:28 by Neurofuse discounts from getfreestuffonl @ : Neurofuse discounts from getfreestuffonl
i read a lot of stuff and i found that the way of writing to clearifing that exactly want to say was very good so i am impressed and ilike to come again in future..  

27 Oct 2015 @ 04:33 by Herrajes para Puertas @ : Herrajes para Puertas
That is the excellent mindset, nonetheless is just not help to make every sence whatsoever preaching about that mather. Virtually any method many thanks in addition to i had endeavor to promote your own article in to delicius nevertheless it is apparently a dilemma using your information sites can you please recheck the idea. thanks once more.  

27 Oct 2015 @ 09:40 by Angel investors in India @ : Angel investors in India
I really love the quality writing as offered on this post, cheers to the writer.  

27 Oct 2015 @ 09:41 by Mississauga Real Estate Agent @ : Mississauga Real Estate Agent
This is a wonderful article. These type of articles keeps the users interest in the website.  

27 Oct 2015 @ 09:42 by Buy high pr backlinks @ : Buy high pr backlinks
I would like to thank you for the efforts you had made for writing this awesome article.  

6 Nov 2015 @ 17:45 by samuel @ : spilleautomater
what an amount of feedback, this post is very popular!
norske spilleautomater  

19 Nov 2015 @ 18:53 by Nicole @ : Use of Charts
Thank you a lot for sharing this fantastic post. You can also read this useful reference if you want to know interesting facts about Use of Charts to Teach Children.

21 Nov 2015 @ 09:05 by http://bos-en-natuurbeheer.tumblr.com @ : http://bos-en-natuurbeheer.tumblr.com
Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article.  

26 Nov 2015 @ 13:55 by http://itsinebikinibody.sosblogs.com/The @ : http://itsinebikinibody.sosblogs.com/The
Thanks for sharing this quality information with us. I really enjoyed reading. Will surely going to share this URL with my friends.  

Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

Other stories in
2012-01-24 00:50: Intellectual Property
2009-06-11 18:53: Blogging/Microblogging and work
2008-02-23 17:19: Web 1, 2, 3 and 4
2008-02-22 11:07: Illusion
2008-01-09 22:45: A Communication Model
2007-12-02 20:41: Give One Get One
2007-10-25 21:47: Static or dynamic web metaphors
2007-09-18 22:54: Rethinking blogs
2007-07-04 23:59: Scrutiny of Information
2007-07-03 01:24: Strangeness

[< Back] [Ming the Mechanic] [PermaLink]? 

Link to this article as: http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001975.htm
Main Page: ming.tv